| 1. Qualifications of project team and individuals: Has the project team worked together successfully on similar projects? Are the people completing the scope of work (especially principals) qualified, available and allocated efficiently and appropriately?
|| (0 - 30)
| 2. General capabilities: How successful does the proposal response portray the proposer's project management abilities? How does the proposal assure the City that the proposer can perform the tasks quickly, but yet maintain quality control? How well does the proposal demonstrate an ability to perform tasks efficiently under an aggressive (time-efficient) schedule and an organized management approach including City staff involvement?
||(0 - 30)
| 3. Specific experiences on similar projects: What experience does the proposal show in producing creative solutions for the projects of similar complexity and schedule?
||(0 - 20)
| 4. Cost estimate: How well does the cost estimate correspond with the scope proposed? What techniques to reduce costs are proposed, and how realistic are they?
||(0 - 10)
| 5. Local Knowledge & Experience: How well do proposers know and understand the City and is there any previous history in working with the City?
||(0 - 5)